Gravel Calculator

Home / Compare

No. 57 stone vs No. 8 stone

The same area needs the same cubic yards of either one, but no. 57 stone weighs about 11% more per yard, which changes the tonnage and often the price.

ft
ft
ft
sq ft
in
%

First material

tons
$

Second material

tons
$

Enter your numbers and press Calculate.

Side by side

No. 57 stoneNo. 8 stone
Nominal size1 in to No. 43/8 in to No. 8
Measured weight range1.29 to 1.47 t/yd³1.16 to 1.52 t/yd³
Weight per cubic yard2,576 lb (1.29 t)2,314 lb (1.16 t)
Cubic yards per ton0.780.86
Sq ft per ton at 3 in8493
Average price––

Weights and prices from the sources listed below.

Both are AASHTO M43 / ASTM D448 sizes. The lower number is the larger stone. FHWA's tests found the unit weights in the table above; see the full gradations for No. 57 and No. 8.

Working it out

Cubic yards = area × depth ÷ 324 (sq ft and inches). Tons = cubic yards × weight per cubic yard.

For 200 sq ft at 3 inches, both need 1.85 cubic yards: 2.39 tons of no. 57 stone or 2.14 tons of no. 8 stone.

Common questions

Which is heavier, no. 57 stone or no. 8 stone?

No. 57 stone at about 1.29 tons per cubic yard, against 1.16.

Sources

  • https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/bridge/15034/003.cfm
  • https://spinternet.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/ConstructionMgt/OnlineDocs/Specifications/2005CMS/700/703.htm